Fertililinfe No 0
When Pasolini wrote, "I know, but I have no evidence," was not only an explicit and precise, but the complaint was also provocative, suggesting to the writers Italians a new way of literature and journalism, which, starting from the real (or as he said last interview \u0026lt;\u0026lt;dall'evidenza>>), to give an ultimate fatally literary matters of public interest. Just call this "taking sides" (understood here in the sense of "being on track", not political), wrongly ignored (as demonstrated by recent successes in television and publishing Lucarelli and De Cataldo), was collected by Alessandro Hellmann, the which addresses one of the darkest pages of recent Italian history: the case of ACNA. And this is another typical local, a paradigm of paradoxes, cover-ups, injury and skirmishes that the descent of Charles VIII to the present, make it unique to this country divisions and lack of sense of belonging which comes from the economic divide and rule of Roman memory.
Thanks to a meticulous work of documentation, collection and study of materials and evidence on the ground, Hellmann reconstructs a history (as he himself states it, this is \u0026lt;\u0026lt;Only one of the infinite ways in which history could be raccontata>> , p. 4) in which the powers, interest, incompetence and institutions are deliberately aimed at the background and people involved, who are still protagonists.
beginning the writing is dry, as essential if the phenol had been in contact with the page itself, then, slowly, open to a subtle irony, and remediation same antidote, the bitterness that accompanies the narration of facts. The danger, however, that avoids Hellmann style, was to generate compassion rather than sympathy for those communities that continue to fight alone against the indifference of the Leviathan who is that so far as to not be involved. History
know again; of this we unfortunately the evidence. Roberto Di Pietro
0 comments:
Post a Comment